Jane John is the co-owner of the shop that traded as Sophia nails, yet she has never shown empathy or concern for the recorded noises.
I would have expected her to be very concerned.
I would have expected her to want to help me get to the source of the noises.
What follows is some of what she did do.
Jane John posted this comment.
I stated that the noises were coming from underneath the floor of my
basement from the direction of the rear of Sophia Nails and that some of the voices recorded were foreign.
It makes no logical sense that just because there was no video evidence, it would not have
anything to do with Sophia Nails.
That toilet was accessed through a door that gave access to both the toilet area and the basement area underneath my house.
That basement was where the noises were recorded.
The toilet was located at the rear of my former property.
It was in a disgusting state.
A Civil Court case between Gareth Edwards, Jane John and myself.
The court case between Gareth Edwards, Jane John and myself came about because we had an
agreement to split the costs of the bill for the work that needed doing after the 2007 fire.
A partial new roof was needed at 20 College Street, the roof was above the flat.
The ceiling of the shop needed reinstating, the ceiling of the shop was
also the floor of the flat above.
When the repairs were finished, I asked them for their share.
They refused to pay any amount towards the repairs.
They denied that there was any agreement between us, and they said that
they had no liability to pay any of the cost involved.
So we ended up in a civil court.
In the civil court case between Gareth Edwards, Jane John, and myself, Jane and Gareth made several counterclaims.
One claim they made was regarding an old right of way to that toilet.
The picture above shows the condition of the toilet when I bought the property.
They argued that the toilet would be used by the customers of their shop when their
shop opened and that I should pay to have it re-instated.
The Judge awarded them discretionary damages of one penny in
respect of that claim.
The court transcript can be read here.
Another claim they made was for a brick wall that secured the house from the gardens behind to be demolished.
After a discussion the wall was allowed to stay in place.
Yet when I put the house up for sale, and before it had sold, someone demolished that wall.
Jane John posted this comment in response to
someone who asked her what was going on in the cellar under her shop.
When I wrote and asked Jane John for permission to put
acoustic sonar in her cellar, she ignored my request.
Jane John stated that she would sue me if I mentioned
any reference to her tenant being involved with drugs.
Yet she would have known that the leasehold owner of Sophia Nails was Trang Thanh Tran.
Operation Violet Panama.
At the time of initial arrests, police officers recovered sufficient plants to produce
between 464kg and 1,394kg of female flowering head cannabis.
At conclusion the estimated street value of the cannabis produced
was between £5.7 million and £17.2 million.
Jane John posted her comment threatening to sue me, three years after Trang Thanh Tran had been convicted.
In May 2019, I was interviewed by Mr Ben Emlyn Jones.
During that interview, Ben played the listeners
of his show some of the recorded noises.
After the interview, Jane John left a comment that stated
’’There are many inaccuracies in Mr Tait’s interview.’’
It follows that Jane John listened to that interview.
What I do not understand is why she showed no concern about the noises that had been recorded.
Ben Emlyn Jones asked her what she considered the inaccuracies were,
and invited Jane John to give her point of view on his show.
Jane John left a message saying that Ben Emlyn Jones had not been
in contact with her.
This is what Ben Emlyn Jones said after reading her message.
Jane John did not take the opportunity to give her point of view on the podcast of Ben Emlyn-Jones.
Her brother Gareth Edwards contacted Ben Emlyn-Jones and was going to give his point of view
on Ben's podcast, but he changed his mind and chose not to.
Jane John posted the following comments on her old Facebook account
.
I queried why they were so selective and did not show more of the conversations she received.
Jane John deleted her Facebook account and started a new one.
Another two of the comments that were posted on her facebook account stated the noises were
’’vents and foxes’’
and another stated that the noises
’’were obviously street noises.’’
The noises are obviously not street noises,
and they are also obviously not the noises of foxes.
